Our ReVolt Pub

hi I have any problems with Our Revolt Pub
I cant to say what I am on member title and with the avatar I have a problem
pls help me

I don't think it is possible to edit your member title for anyone, only the moderators/adminstrators can do that (I think).

...And what problem is there with your avatar?

urnemanden @ Apr 4 2009, 01:57 PM wrote: ...And what problem is there with your avatar?

I cant to put what avatar I have on my desktop

Hi Miromiro,

from your avatar and member title I deduce the following facts:

1. You are a goldfish
2. You are an alcoholic

This leads me to suspect strongly you swim in a goldfish bowl filled with alcohol. Question: how can you type with fins and do you have a special keyboard that can be held under water?

That's all for now.

arto @ Apr 4 2009, 07:19 PM wrote: Hi Miromiro,

from your avatar and member title I deduce the following facts:

1. You are a goldfish
2. You are an alcoholic

This leads me to suspect strongly you swim in a goldfish bowl filled with alcohol. Question: how can you type with fins and do you have a special keyboard that can be held under water?

That's all for now.

thanks arto for all......so to advance I must to post ....

yeah, but for god's sake, DON'T spam old topics from 2005!!

Volty @ Apr 4 2009, 08:28 PM wrote: yeah, but for god's sake, DON'T spam old topics from 2005!!

ok ok be calm but I was curios to see what member title does I have later I have 100 posts and 200 and 300 .....

Oh, lol. I thought you meant a personal member title

I cool now I'm a Annoying Teen Noob...cool..thanks arto for rename my member title

because I don't drink alcohol ...so I'm not alcoholic

miromiro @ Apr 5 2009, 08:49 AM wrote:I cool now I'm a Annoying Teen Noob...cool..thanks arto for rename my member title

Erm!!
You mean, thank you Manmountain.
Don't worry, you earned that title all by yourself.

miromiro @ Apr 4 2009, 07:35 PM wrote:

arto @ Apr 4 2009, 07:19 PM wrote: Hi Miromiro,

from your avatar and member title I deduce the following facts:

1. You are a goldfish
2. You are an alcoholic

This leads me to suspect strongly you swim in a goldfish bowl filled with alcohol. Question: how can you type with fins and do you have a special keyboard that can be held under water?

That's all for now.

thanks arto for all......so to advance I must to post ....

Your reply reveals to me that my question has been interpreted as a suggestion. With sadness I withhold from further discussion.

arto @ Apr 5 2009, 06:02 PM wrote:

miromiro @ Apr 4 2009, 07:35 PM wrote:

arto @ Apr 4 2009, 07:19 PM wrote: Hi Miromiro,

from your avatar and member title I deduce the following facts:

1. You are a goldfish
2. You are an alcoholic

This leads me to suspect strongly you swim in a goldfish bowl filled with alcohol. Question: how can you type with fins and do you have a special keyboard that can be held under water?

That's all for now.

thanks arto for all......so to advance I must to post ....

Your reply reveals to me that my question has been interpreted as a suggestion. With sadness I withhold from further discussion.

oh yeah.....

arto @ Apr 4 2009, 07:19 PM wrote: Hi Miromiro,

from your avatar and member title I deduce the following facts:

1. You are a goldfish
2. You are an alcoholic

This leads me to suspect strongly you swim in a goldfish bowl filled with alcohol. Question: how can you type with fins and do you have a special keyboard that can be held under water?

That's all for now.

rofl that made me laugh so much

A BIG AND HORRIBLE PROBLEM!
FOR ME 60% OF OUR REVOLT PUB IS DOWN!
WHEN I CLICK ON REVOLT PUB FORUM FROM RVZT THEY'RE NOT ALL TOPICS!
THREE TOPICS ARE VISIBLE TO ME!
TTT MASTER CLASS
OUTSIDE THE PUB AND
NEWS!
AND IT'S A BIG PROBLEM WITH MY POSTS
I HAD 204 POSTS AND NOW I HAVE 51
MANMOUNTAIN AND THEMEANDME PLEASE FIX THIS
FOR ME REVOLT ZONE TRACKS AND OUR REVOLT PUB ARE THE BEST SITES AND NOW IS HORRIBLE BECAUSE OUR REVOLT PUB IS DOWN!

Nothing is wrong with Our Revolt Pub. The thing is that you probaly have been limited. I can't tell you more.

i think the reasons for this miromiro, are because you brought up old topics so much and post on everything, that the admin decided to delete your posts on the old topics. to keep you from posting SO MUCH he took away your posting privileges from certain topics. come on, you had 204 posts in 2 months! don't post to much and you might get back your privileges. or you could simply try asking for them back.

Just to clarify,
I have spoken with miromiro and explained my actions.
I don't mind lots of posts, its just that the posts were one word or statement answers and did not actually add to or envoke good communication.

Teen noob's ! what can I say ?

Manmountain @ Apr 13 2009, 08:09 PM wrote: Just to clarify,
I have spoken with miromiro and explained my actions.
I don't mind lots of posts, its just that the posts were one word or statement answers and did not actually add to or envoke good communication.

Teen noob's ! what can I say ?

yes manmountain we teen noobs are crazy! lol and excuse me again

Teen noob's ! what can I say ? 

lol were not all noobs

zipperrulez @ Apr 13 2009, 10:44 PM wrote:

Teen noob's ! what can I say ? 

lol were not all noobs

Actually, we are all Noob's at one time in our lives.

Some of us tend not to exaggerate the fact until we'er not.

Manmountain @ Apr 14 2009, 01:11 AM wrote:

zipperrulez @ Apr 13 2009, 10:44 PM wrote:

Teen noob's ! what can I say ? 

lol were not all noobs

Actually, we are all Noob's at one time in our lives.

Some of us tend not to exaggerate the fact until we'er not.

you're right we are all nobs but no all have on they're member title Annoying Teen Noob .... when a new member log in here and see one of my comments he or she know I'm an Annoying Teen Noob but for me is no problem

Hey,hey,then call me something!!!

nero @ Apr 14 2009, 11:28 AM wrote: Hey,hey,then call me something!!!

sorry
and for arto : somebody put joke grades to any of my tracks please to delete them

nero @ Apr 14 2009, 11:28 AM wrote: Hey,hey,then call me something!!!

I am not sure, but my theory is that you need to obtain some respect of some kind. Or maybe you have to share something big with the community. Or maybe MM or TMAM just need a request or get an idea to a personal title. Or maybe they only do it when they are bored. Or maybe... maybe something else. I don't have one myself, so I can't tell ya

Oh, and miromiro what do you mean with joke grades? I took a look at your recently tracks and they looked all fine.

urnemanden @ Apr 14 2009, 11:59 AM wrote: Oh, and miromiro what do you mean with joke grades? I took a look at your recently tracks and they looked all fine.

LOOK NOW AT MY TRACK AND AT SIMPLE SPEED AND SEE THE GRADES!
I PUT TO IT 10/10/10/10
AND A JOKER PUT 1/1/1/1

miromiro @ Apr 14 2009, 12:35 PM wrote: LOOK NOW AT MY TRACK AND AT SIMPLE SPEED AND SEE THE GRADES!
I PUT TO IT 10/10/10/10
AND A JOKER PUT 1/1/1/1 

hmm... One thing is that someone is making the grades so low as you appearently think someone did. Another thing is that you are giving too high grades for your own track. But of course if you only did it to keep your track at a medium rate, then its ok. Just remember to tell arto also to remove your rate, unless you really think that your own track is worth better rates than even PetroVolt has.

You are right Miro, 10 10 10 10 is a joke grade and should be removed

Geoff

nero @ Apr 14 2009, 11:28 AM wrote:Hey,hey,then call me something!!!

How about 'Nero 2 ZERO'

miromiro @ Apr 14 2009, 12:35 PM wrote:LOOK NOW AT MY TRACK AND AT SIMPLE SPEED AND SEE THE GRADES!
I PUT TO IT 10/10/10/10
AND A JOKER PUT 1/1/1/1 

Maybe 1/1/1/1 is the lowest they could actually give you other than 0/0/0/0.

GWC @ Apr 14 2009, 03:58 PM wrote: You are right Miro, 10 10 10 10 is a joke grade and should be removed

Geoff

maybe but 1/1/1/1 is a joke grade too!

Manmountain @ Apr 14 2009, 06:34 PM wrote: Maybe 1/1/1/1 is the lowest they could actually give you other than 0/0/0/0.

If he hate the track he mustn't to put so small grades

miromiro @ Apr 14 2009, 11:53 AM wrote:

nero @ Apr 14 2009, 11:28 AM wrote: Hey,hey,then call me something!!!

sorry
and for arto : somebody put joke grades to any of my tracks please to delete them

I saw that you have put lots of joke grades. I removed them. And some other joke grades too.

arto @ Apr 14 2009, 07:38 PM wrote: I saw that you have put lots of joke grades.

yes I put grades to all my tracks later other put they're grades . I put to my tracks 10/10/10/10 because I found them cool and they are so good to have 10/10/10/10 but.....

The track that has the highest grades, has 9,5/9,6/9,1/7. And you think that your lego track deserves 10/10/10/10? I do not agree with you at all.

By giving your own tracks the highest grade aviable, you are telling other people indirectly that your tracks is so much better than ours that even the highest graded tracks can't beat yours. I do not agree with you that 10/10/10/10 is okay!

urnemanden @ Apr 14 2009, 08:51 PM wrote: The track that has the highest grades, has 9,5/9,6/9,1/7. And you think that your lego track deserves 10/10/10/10? I do not agree with you at all.

By giving your own tracks the highest grade aviable, you are telling other people indirectly that your tracks is so much better than ours that even the highest graded tracks can't beat yours. I do not agree with you that 10/10/10/10 is okay!

OMG! i PUT 10/10/10/10 BECAUSE i KNOW RACERS AND AUTHORS PUT SMALL GRADES! TODAY WAS AN EXAMPLE : SOMEBODY PUT 1/1/1/1 TO SIMPLE SPEED!!!!
AND IF I DIDN'T PUT 10/10/10/10 TO MY TRACK MY FINAL GRADES BE 1/1/1/1 SO THEY ARE 5.5/5.5/5.5/5.5 , BUT LATER ARTO OR GEOFF (NOT SURE) REFRESH THIS JOKE GRADES! BUT MAYBE THIS "JOKE" WITH MY BIG GRADES MUST TO BE MY SECRET!!!!! LOL

miromiro @ Apr 14 2009, 08:17 PM wrote:

arto @ Apr 14 2009, 07:38 PM wrote: I saw that you have put lots of joke grades.

yes I put grades to all my tracks later other put they're grades . I put to my tracks 10/10/10/10 because I found them cool and they are so good to have 10/10/10/10 but.....

It's a joke grade because it lacks any objective attempt at grading the track. There is no way you could objectively say a lego track that uses the stock textures has a graphics of 10. Contrast this to graphics of some Skitch tracks for example, which quite well could deserve a 10, and it is easy to say the person who is putting 10 to a lego track is doing it as a joke or maybe to annoy me. I've discovered feeling annoyance makes me grumpy and prone to do retaliatory actions against those causing it.

Likewise if I see all 1's it's most likely a joke grade. First of all a simple lego track is hard to make visually so appaling to deserve a 1 for graphics. Second it'd require quite an achievement to have flow and difficulty at the same time as 1. I mean how can a track that is so easy to get 1 as difficulty at the same time flow so badly that it gets 1 for flow? It'd require a genius master mind I think.

Well, long story short, silly votes will be annihilated without mercy for the good of mankind no matter what the voter's excuses are.

arto @ Apr 15 2009, 05:57 AM wrote:
Well, long story short, silly votes will be annihilated without mercy for the good of mankind no matter what the voter's excuses are.

good. thats the way it should be
i really dunno why you would give anything a 10/10/10/10 because there isnt a perfect track imo -.-

zipperrulez @ Apr 15 2009, 08:40 PM wrote:

arto @ Apr 15 2009, 05:57 AM wrote:
Well, long story short, silly votes will be annihilated without mercy for the good of mankind no matter what the voter's excuses are.

good. thats the way it should be
i really dunno why you would give anything a 10/10/10/10 because there isnt a perfect track imo -.-

and as arto said above, a track which is so difficult with a 10 grade, cant have a flow worth another 10

Crone94 @ Apr 16 2009, 06:49 AM wrote:

zipperrulez @ Apr 15 2009, 08:40 PM wrote:

arto @ Apr 15 2009, 05:57 AM wrote:
Well, long story short, silly votes will be annihilated without mercy for the good of mankind no matter what the voter's excuses are.

good. thats the way it should be
i really dunno why you would give anything a 10/10/10/10 because there isnt a perfect track imo -.-

and as arto said above, a track which is so difficult with a 10 grade, cant have a flow worth another 10

sure that's true crone but look at this :
http://revolt.speedweek.net/main/commen ... ntartika+2

http://revolt.speedweek.net/main/commen ... ntartika+3

http://revolt.speedweek.net/main/commen ... me=On+Fire

http://revolt.speedweek.net/main/commen ... ernal+Doom

look at this tracks and say me why arto don't refresh this joke grades and say your option about this , too

miromiro @ Apr 16 2009, 07:44 AM wrote:sure that's true crone but look at this :
http://revolt.speedweek.net/main/commen ... ntartika+2

http://revolt.speedweek.net/main/commen ... ntartika+3

http://revolt.speedweek.net/main/commen ... me=On+Fire

http://revolt.speedweek.net/main/commen ... ernal+Doom

look at this tracks and say me why arto don't refresh this joke grades and say your option about this , too 

Perhaps arto doesnt have time to check every track on rvzt and fix them, afterall there's pretty many

Crone94 @ Apr 16 2009, 11:33 AM wrote:

miromiro @ Apr 16 2009, 07:44 AM wrote:sure that's true crone but look at this :
http://revolt.speedweek.net/main/commen ... ntartika+2

http://revolt.speedweek.net/main/commen ... ntartika+3

http://revolt.speedweek.net/main/commen ... me=On+Fire

http://revolt.speedweek.net/main/commen ... ernal+Doom

look at this tracks and say me why arto don't refresh this joke grades and say your option about this , too 

Perhaps arto doesnt have time to check every track on rvzt and fix them, afterall there's pretty many

maybe because in rvzt are hundreds of track

ohh those tracks looks pretty good from the photos.
these seems to be older tracks. some of the first customs. maybe only legos was being created then .

okay. just raced one of the tracks from the above list and one of the newer ones. can't say the older deserve 10's down the board w/ today's voting. but i can say it was better then one of the newer ones. if i saw the track when it was first created and voted...then.. maybe straight 8/9. btw the track i raced was eternal doom. the overall feel was nice

jaseaka @ Apr 16 2009, 02:17 PM wrote: ohh those tracks looks pretty good from the photos.
these seems to be older tracks. some of the first customs. maybe only legos was being created then .

sure if you see a lot of tracks are created in 18 august 2000!
maybe in 10 years our tracks does have 1000s of downloads!

tomorrow is a big day for me here in ORP but I can't to say why is my secret .

miromiro @ Apr 16 2009, 02:40 PM wrote: tomorrow is a big day for me here in ORP but I can't to say why is my secret .

im going to guess its your birthday.
i dunno though

zipperrulez @ Apr 17 2009, 02:12 AM wrote:

miromiro @ Apr 16 2009, 02:40 PM wrote: tomorrow is a big day for me here in ORP but I can't to say why is my secret .

im going to guess its your birthday.
i dunno though

NO , tomorrow or today because the message come yesterday , today ManMountain must to unlock the topics from ORP because he said he unlock them a week later , from today is a week and hope he want to do this !

and do you think we care enough to post 3 times about it?
Stuff like that is why you got banned

Crone94 @ Apr 17 2009, 10:53 AM wrote: and do you think we care enough to post 3 times about it?
Stuff like that is why you got banned

maybe....but....

Manmountain @ Apr 11 2009,private message to miromiro wrote:Look at how you have posted your last post, lots of SHOUTING as if you don't know why.
You will be restricted for at least one week as long as you don't post any rubbish anywhere else, OK ?

That is what I said to you.

Please note the last statement.

When I am ready or when a majority request has been asked then maybe, OK ?

Manmountain @ Apr 17 2009, 08:13 PM wrote:

Manmountain @ Apr 11 2009,private message to miromiro wrote:Look at how you have posted your last post, lots of SHOUTING as if you don't know why.
You will be restricted for at least one week as long as you don't post any rubbish anywhere else, OK ?

That is what I said to you.

Please note the last statement.

When I am ready or when a majority request has been asked then maybe, OK ?

OK but.... how I said you are the admin.